FUNDER SNAPSHOT: Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation

Prospect for: Riverside Youth Coding Academy | Prepared: April 27, 2026

---

1. VERDICT: GOOD FIT (Score: 74/100)

The CEO would likely proceed with a targeted, relationship-driven approach. Geographic alignment is strong - 100% of documented giving is in California, with San Francisco and the Bay Area as the clear center of gravity, and Riverside Youth Coding Academy's Oakland/SF/East Bay footprint lands squarely inside that zone. Mission overlap on underserved youth, after-school enrichment, and career exposure is genuine and multi-dimensional. The limiting factor is access: this funder does not accept unsolicited applications, has only six grants on record, and its portfolio skews toward general human services rather than STEM specifically - making a warm introduction a prerequisite, not a nice-to-have.

---

2. KEY STATS

---

3. STRONGEST ALIGNMENT POINTS

• Geographic bulls-eye. All $191,780 in documented giving stayed in California; 54.7% went to San Francisco specifically. Riverside Youth Coding Academy's Oakland/SF/East Bay service area is a direct match.
• Free access for underserved youth. The foundation's stated priorities include after-school care, educational enrichment, and youth opportunity - all core to Riverside's free cohort model serving Title I school students in OUSD and SFUSD.
• Paid apprenticeship pipeline. The foundation explicitly values career exposure and readiness. Riverside's paid teen tech apprenticeships with Bay Area employers are a differentiated, outcomes-oriented hook that few youth coding programs can offer.
• 100% new-grantee rate in 2025. Every recorded grant went to a first-time recipient, signaling the foundation is actively building new relationships - a meaningful opening for a well-introduced prospect.

---

4. POTENTIAL DISCONNECTS

• No STEM-specific grant history. The six documented grantees include Meals on Wheels, Salvation Army, First Responders San Rafael, and Raphael House - a human services portfolio with no clear coding or CS education precedent. Riverside must frame its work as youth opportunity and enrichment, not technology education.
• Invite-only access model. Program descriptions explicitly state the foundation does not accept unsolicited requests. Without a warm introduction through Bay Area tech mentors, school district partners, or shared networks, conversion odds drop materially regardless of mission fit.
• Very small, early-stage funder. Only one year of grant data exists, total assets are $210,961, and leadership attribution is inconsistent across sources (two individuals listed as president). Future giving capacity and strategic stability are uncertain.

---

5. BOTTOM LINE

Pursue this funder, but only through a warm introduction - cold outreach is unlikely to convert given the invite-only model and small grant pool. Lead with a tightly scoped project request tied to one Oakland or San Francisco cohort expansion, a second summer intensive, or apprenticeship employer pipeline development, framed explicitly as Bay Area youth opportunity and after-school enrichment rather than a STEM or coding ask. Open with a $35,000 ask aligned to the median grant; anchor at $10,000 if the relationship is early-stage, and reserve the $45,000-$50,000 stretch for cases with a confirmed warm connection to Olivia Stobo, William Wang, or a current grantee.

DEEP DIVE INTELLIGENCE MEMO

Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation x Riverside Youth Coding Academy

Prepared: April 27, 2026 | Verdict: GOOD FIT (Score: 74/100) | Recommended Ask: $35,000

---

1. FUNDER DNA

Mission and Vision Foundations

Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation is a small, California-exclusive private foundation with a stated orientation toward underserved youth, after-school enrichment, educational access, career exposure, and mentoring. Its name and documented giving suggest a belief that geography and opportunity are linked - that Bay Area young people, particularly those in under-resourced communities, deserve structured pathways to brighter futures. The foundation's language consistently references hands-on partnership, performance-based outcomes, and locally grounded programming.

Values and Priorities

• Equity-oriented youth development, with emphasis on underserved and low-income populations
• After-school care, summer enrichment, and educational access as core vehicles for change
• Career exposure and readiness as measurable outcomes, not just aspirational goals
• Community-embedded service delivery, particularly in San Francisco and the broader Bay Area
• Performance and accountability - the funder's language suggests it values grantees who can report outcomes clearly

Decision-Making Style

Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation operates as a relationship-driven, invitation-based grantmaker. All documented program descriptions indicate it does not accept unsolicited applications. With only six grants on record - all made in 2025 - this appears to be a relatively new or newly active foundation still building its portfolio. The 100% new-grantee rate in the available year suggests the foundation is actively forming relationships rather than renewing existing ones, which is a meaningful opening for well-positioned organizations with warm introductions.

---

2. GRANT HISTORY PATTERNS

Typical Grant Sizes and Trends

The grant range of $8,000 to $50,680 reflects a funder comfortable with both modest project support and more substantial single-year investments. The median of $40,000 suggests the foundation is willing to make meaningful commitments when the fit is strong. Only one year of data is available, so trend analysis is not yet possible.

Geographic Preferences

• 100% of documented grantmaking went to California
• San Francisco received 4 of 6 grants, representing approximately 54.7% of total dollars ($104,980)
• One grant went to San Rafael; one to Palos Verdes
• No grants outside California are documented
• Oakland and the East Bay are referenced in program descriptions as intended service geographies, even if not yet reflected in the grant record

Types of Initiatives Funded

The 2025 portfolio reveals a broader human-services orientation than a pure youth-development or STEM focus:

• Meals on Wheels of SF ($50,680) - food security and senior services
• First Responders San Rafael ($46,800) - emergency services support
• Salvation Army ($40,000) - broad human services
• Raphael House of SF ($30,800) - family shelter and housing stability
• Fam 1st Family Foundation ($15,500) - family support services
• Larkin Street Youth Services ($8,000) - youth homelessness and housing

Key Observation: The only grant with direct youth-development alignment is Larkin Street Youth Services, and it received the smallest grant in the portfolio ($8,000). This is a meaningful signal. The foundation's stated priorities include youth enrichment and career exposure, but its actual 2025 giving skewed toward food security, housing, emergency services, and family support. Coding education is not yet a documented niche. This does not disqualify Riverside Youth Coding Academy, but it means the organization should frame its work in the language of youth opportunity and community support - not purely as a STEM or technology initiative.

---

3. NTEE CODE ALIGNMENT

Funder's Primary NTEE Code: O12 (Youth Development - Management and Technical Assistance)

Inferred Funder NTEE Codes: P20 (Human Service Organizations), F60 (Counseling), P200, P300, X200

Riverside Youth Coding Academy's NTEE Codes:

• B25: Secondary/High School (100% relevance)
• B30: Vocational/Technical Schools (100% relevance)

Alignment Analysis

Direct NTEE code overlap between the funder and Riverside Youth Coding Academy is limited based on the documented grant distribution. The funder's actual grantees cluster in human services (P-codes), counseling (F60), food access (K31), and religious/civic categories (X200). Neither B25 nor B30 appears in the funder's current portfolio.

However, the funder's primary NTEE code of O12 - Youth Development - is meaningfully adjacent to both B25 and B30. Youth development and secondary education share significant programmatic overlap, particularly when the program model includes after-school enrichment, mentoring, and career readiness. The apprenticeship pipeline (B30) is especially well-positioned to bridge the gap between the funder's youth-development orientation and Riverside Youth Coding Academy's education-focused model.

Strongest Alignment Categories

• O12 (Youth Development) is the funder's own primary code and the strongest conceptual bridge to Riverside Youth Coding Academy's work
• P20 (Human Service Organizations) reflects the funder's comfort with direct-service, community-embedded models
• The Larkin Street Youth Services grant (youth-focused, Bay Area, direct service) is the closest existing analog to Riverside Youth Coding Academy in the portfolio

Strategic Framing Recommendations

Do not lead with "coding education" or "STEM." Frame the work as:

• Youth opportunity and advancement for underserved Bay Area teens
• After-school and summer enrichment with measurable career outcomes
• A pipeline from free access to paid apprenticeship - a youth development arc, not a curriculum
• Community infrastructure that keeps low-income youth engaged, skilled, and employed

---

4. DECISION-MAKER INSIGHTS

Key Personnel

Data Gap: No biographical information, professional backgrounds, or public professional profiles are available for any of the above individuals. This limits the ability to identify shared networks, prior giving interests, or personal connections to youth education or technology.

Decision-Making Process

• The foundation does not appear to accept unsolicited applications, suggesting decisions are made through board-initiated relationships or referrals
• The small board size (5-6 members) and single-year grant history suggest a founder-influenced or closely held decision process
• The inconsistency between Olivia Stobo and William Wang as "President" in different sources may reflect a co-leadership model or a recent leadership transition - worth clarifying before outreach
• Jacob/Jake Mizrahi appearing in both staff and board contexts suggests a small, overlapping governance and operations structure

What Matters Most to Them

Based on available evidence:

• Local Bay Area impact, particularly in San Francisco and nearby communities
• Direct service to underserved populations with clear beneficiary demographics
• Measurable outcomes and performance accountability
• Hands-on, community-embedded program models
• Relationships and trust - this is not a transactional grantmaker

---

5. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

Data Limitations

No information is available on other organizations currently applying to or funded by Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation beyond the six documented 2025 grantees. A full competitive landscape analysis is not possible with available data.

What Can Be Inferred

• The foundation made only 6 grants in 2025, meaning the absolute number of funded organizations is very small. Even strong applicants face a constrained opportunity set.
• Current grantees (Meals on Wheels, Salvation Army, Raphael House, Larkin Street) are established Bay Area institutions with long track records and deep community roots. Riverside Youth Coding Academy would be entering a portfolio that currently skews toward legacy human-services organizations.
• Larkin Street Youth Services is the most direct analog - a Bay Area youth-focused direct-service organization. Its $8,000 grant (the smallest in the portfolio) may reflect either a first-year relationship-building grant or a lower priority relative to the foundation's other interests.
• No other coding education or STEM-focused organizations appear in the current portfolio, which means Riverside Youth Coding Academy would be a category-defining grant for this funder - a potential advantage if framed correctly, or a risk if the funder is not yet ready to expand into that space.

Strategic Implication

Position Riverside Youth Coding Academy not as a competitor to existing grantees but as a complementary investment - one that addresses a different dimension of youth need (economic mobility and career readiness) that the current portfolio does not yet cover.

---

6. APPLICATION INTELLIGENCE

Process and Access

• No open application process is documented. Multiple program descriptions explicitly state the foundation does not accept unsolicited requests.
• A warm introduction is not just preferred - it is likely required for any realistic chance of funding.
• The foundation's 100% new-grantee rate in 2025 is a positive signal: the foundation is actively forming new relationships, not just renewing existing ones.

What a Strong Submission Looks Like

Based on the funder's apparent values and portfolio patterns, a compelling approach would include:

• A tightly scoped project request, not a general operating ask. Examples: one Oakland/SF cohort expansion, a second summer intensive, apprenticeship employer pipeline development, or instructor onboarding.
• Clear beneficiary demographics: low-income, BIPOC, Title I school students in Oakland and San Francisco. Make the population vivid and specific.
• Concrete outcomes with near-term milestones: students enrolled, cohorts completed, apprenticeships placed, stipends distributed.
• A one-page outcomes brief showing current performance data - retention, completion rates, apprenticeship placements, student advancement.
• A local Bay Area story: name the schools, name the neighborhoods, name the tech mentors. This funder responds to geographic specificity.

Timing Considerations

• Only one year of grant data is available (2025), so no seasonal grant cycle can be confirmed.
• Given the relationship-driven model, timing is less about a grant deadline and more about when a warm introduction can be secured.
• The foundation's small asset base ($210,961 total assets against $191,780 in annual grants) suggests it may be operating close to its annual capacity. Outreach earlier in the calendar year - before the portfolio is committed - is advisable.

Key Questions to Answer Before Applying

1. Can Riverside Youth Coding Academy clearly document current service delivery in Oakland, San Francisco, or the East Bay - not just expansion plans?
2. Does the organization have any existing connection to Bay Area Bright Futures board members, staff, or current grantees?
3. Can the organization present a specific, bounded project with a clear budget and 12-month milestones?
4. Are outcome metrics strong enough to satisfy a performance-oriented funder?

---

7. POSITIONING STRATEGY

How to Frame the Work

The single most important framing shift: this is not a coding education grant. It is a youth opportunity investment.

Lead with the transformation: a low-income Oakland teenager who had never written a line of code now has a paid tech apprenticeship, a Bay Area industry mentor, and a clear path to a career that pays a living wage. The coding is the vehicle. The transformation is the story.

Key Differentiators to Emphasize

• Free access removes the economic barrier entirely - no fees, no equipment costs, no prerequisites
• The in-school plus after-school plus summer model meets students where they are, across multiple touchpoints
• The paid apprenticeship pipeline converts learning into economic opportunity - students earn money, not just credentials
• Bay Area tech mentors provide locally grounded industry connection that is rare in youth programs
• The intent to publish outcomes and influence district STEM investment signals systems-level ambition, not just program delivery
• 100% Bay Area focus - Oakland, San Francisco, East Bay - matches the funder's geographic priorities exactly

Potential Objections and How to Address Them

---

8. OPPORTUNITY FRAMING

The Core Opportunity

Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation is a small, locally focused funder that cares about underserved Bay Area youth and wants to see measurable impact. Riverside Youth Coding Academy delivers exactly that - free, structured, outcomes-tracked programming for low-income Oakland and San Francisco teens, with a paid apprenticeship pathway that converts participation into economic opportunity.

The gap between the funder's stated priorities and its current portfolio (which skews toward food, shelter, and crisis services) is actually an opening. The foundation has not yet made a significant investment in youth career readiness or economic mobility. Riverside Youth Coding Academy can be the organization that fills that gap - if it can secure the right introduction.

The Transformation Story

Frame every touchpoint around this arc:

• A student arrives: low-income, no CS background, attending a Title I school in Oakland or San Francisco
• The program provides: free instruction, mentorship, community, and a summer intensive
• The student advances: completes a cohort, ships a project, earns a paid apprenticeship
• The outcome: a Bay Area teenager with marketable skills, industry connections, and a stipend - on a path to economic independence

This is the story Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation was built to fund.

Specific Project Angles

The following project frames are most likely to resonate based on funder priorities:

1. Oakland Cohort Expansion - Fund the addition of two new East Bay school sites, serving 40+ additional students per year. Concrete, local, measurable.
2. Summer Intensive Expansion - Fund a second annual summer intensive, with specific enrollment targets, instructor costs, and student stipends.
3. Apprenticeship Pipeline Growth - Fund the apprenticeship coordinator position and employer outreach to double placements from 30 to 60 per year.
4. Outcomes Infrastructure - Fund the program operations lead hire and outcome-reporting system to produce the anonymized cohort data the organization plans to share with OUSD and SFUSD.

---

9. ASK STRATEGY

Recommended Ask: $35,000

This figure is grounded in the Deep Dive Intelligence Evaluation and aligns with the foundation's documented median grant of $40,000 (with a slight discount for a first-time relationship).

Grant Structure

• Single-year project grant is the most appropriate structure for a first ask, consistent with the funder's documented one-time grant pattern
• Do not request multi-year general operating support on a first approach - this funder has no documented history of multi-year commitments and the relationship is not yet established
• Frame the ask around a specific, bounded project with a 12-month timeline and clear deliverables

What the $35,000 Should Fund

Tie the ask to one of the specific project angles above. A sample framing:

"A $35,000 investment would fund the expansion of our Oakland cohort programming to two additional East Bay school sites, serving 40 new students in the 2026-2027 school year, including instructor costs, curriculum materials, and student stipends for the apprenticeship pathway."

990-Based Insights

• Total foundation assets of $210,961 against annual grantmaking of $191,780 suggests the foundation is distributing nearly all of its available resources annually. This is a high-payout funder relative to its asset base.
• A $35,000 ask represents approximately 18.3% of the foundation's total 2025 grantmaking - meaningful but not outsized relative to the portfolio (the largest grant was $50,680, or 26.4% of total giving).
• The foundation's revenue of $408,799 against assets of $210,961 suggests active fundraising or donor contributions, which may mean grantmaking capacity could grow. Monitor for future 990 filings.
• The small asset base also means the foundation may not be able to sustain current grantmaking levels indefinitely. A first grant now - while the foundation is actively building its portfolio - may be more achievable than waiting.

---

10. RELATIONSHIP PLAN

Priority: Secure a Warm Introduction

This is the single most important action item. The foundation does not accept unsolicited applications. No amount of proposal quality will substitute for a trusted introduction. Every other step in this plan is secondary to this one.

Step-by-Step Relationship Roadmap

Immediate (April - June 2026)

• Map the network: Ask board members, tech mentors, school district partners, and peer organizations whether anyone has a personal or professional connection to Olivia Stobo, William Wang, Jacob Mizrahi, Patrick Hanlon, Derek Smith, Brandon Child, or Taylor Choi.
• Research current grantees: Larkin Street Youth Services is the most likely bridge. Identify staff or board members at Larkin Street who may know Bay Area Bright Futures leadership and could make an introduction.
• Clarify leadership: Determine whether Olivia Stobo or William Wang is the current primary decision-maker. The press release reference to Wang may reflect a co-leadership structure or a transition. Knowing who to approach matters.
• Document Bay Area operations: Compile a one-page proof of current service delivery in Oakland, San Francisco, and the East Bay - school names, student demographics, cohort completion data, apprenticeship placements. This is the foundation of any credible outreach.

Near-Term (July - September 2026)

• If a warm introduction is secured: Request a brief introductory conversation (15-20 minutes), not a formal pitch. Lead with curiosity about the foundation's priorities. Share the one-page outcomes brief. Ask what kinds of youth opportunity investments they are considering.
• If no introduction is available: Identify Bay Area tech company partners, OUSD/SFUSD district contacts, or youth-serving coalitions (e.g., Oakland Thrives, SF Beacon Initiative) that may have existing relationships with the foundation.
• Prepare a concise project brief (1-2 pages) for the Oakland cohort expansion or apprenticeship pipeline growth, ready to share at any point.

Medium-Term (October - December 2026)

• If relationship is developing: Invite a foundation representative to visit a cohort session or apprenticeship showcase. Experiential engagement is more powerful than any written proposal for a relationship-driven funder.
• Submit a formal request only after a conversation has occurred and there is a signal of interest. Frame the ask at $35,000 for a specific 12-month project.
• If the foundation is not yet ready for a full grant: Propose a smaller first investment ($10,000) tied to a single cohort or summer intensive, with a clear path to a larger partnership in year two.

Ongoing

• Monitor the foundation's 990 filings for new grant data, leadership changes, or shifts in giving priorities.
• Watch for any public announcements, press releases, or social media activity that signals new program interests or open application windows.
• Maintain the relationship regardless of immediate funding outcome - this is a small, locally embedded funder that values trust over time.

---

Summary Scorecard

---

This memo is based on available data as of April 27, 2026. Key data gaps include grantee budget, organizational age, and leadership biographical information. Recommendations should be updated as new information becomes available, particularly additional 990 filings from Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation.

Conversation Guide: Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation

Riverside Youth Coding Academy | April 27, 2026 Single Presenter | Recommended Ask: $35,000

---

1. Authentic Opening

"Thank you so much for making time today. I want to start with something personal, because I think it gets at why this work matters so much to me.

When I think about the students we serve in Oakland and San Francisco, I keep coming back to one image: a kid who is genuinely curious about technology, who has watched the Bay Area tech economy grow up around them their entire life, and who has never once been invited inside it. Not because they lack talent or drive, but simply because no one ever handed them the tools or the door.

That gap, between curiosity and access, is exactly what Riverside Youth Coding Academy exists to close. And it is why I am genuinely excited to be in conversation with the Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation today."

---

2. High-Level Vision

"Our vision is straightforward, even if the work is not: every low-income young person in the Bay Area who wants to learn to code should be able to, for free, with real mentorship, and with a real pathway into the industry.

Right now, we serve roughly 120 middle and high school students each year through free in-school and after-school coding cohorts, a summer intensive, and a paid teen apprenticeship pipeline that places students into mentored tech internships. Our students are BIPOC and first-generation college-bound youth attending Title I schools in OUSD and SFUSD. Many of them have never had a structured computer science class before they walk through our door.

What we have built is not just a coding program. It is a youth opportunity pipeline, one that starts with a curious seventh grader and ends with a paid apprentice who has shipped real work, built a professional network, and can see themselves in a tech career."

---

3. Discovery Question

"Before I go further, I would love to hear from you. When the Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation thinks about investing in young people in Oakland and San Francisco, what does meaningful impact look like to you? Are there particular gaps in the youth landscape here that feel most urgent right now?"

(Listen carefully. Note any language around after-school enrichment, career exposure, underserved youth, or community-based programming. Reflect it back in the priorities section.)

---

4. Strategic Priorities

"With that in mind, let me share where we are focused over the next 24 months. Three things are driving our work right now.

First, expanding our reach in the East Bay and San Francisco. We are adding two new school sites and a second annual summer intensive, which will grow our cohort from 120 students to 200-plus per year. Every new site means more students who would otherwise have no structured CS instruction at all.

Second, building the infrastructure to sustain that growth. We are hiring a full-time program operations lead and a part-time apprenticeship coordinator. We are also formalizing our curriculum review process with a volunteer board of Bay Area tech mentors. These are not glamorous investments, but they are what allow us to grow without losing quality.

Third, using our data to change the system. We are publishing anonymized cohort outcomes to inform district decisions on STEM funding, and we are actively advocating for permanent CS course offerings in OUSD and SFUSD. Our goal is not just to serve 200 students a year. It is to make the case that every student in these districts deserves this access, and to put evidence behind that argument.

For example, right now 85 percent of our graduating cohort students report increased confidence pursuing a CS course in college. That is the kind of outcome data that moves district conversations."

---

5. Permission to Discuss Specific Funding

"I would love to talk about what a partnership might look like between our organizations. Would it be alright if I shared a specific funding opportunity and the thinking behind it?"

(Pause and wait for confirmation before continuing.)

---

6. Funding Rationale (Budget and Ask)

"We are seeking $35,000 from Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation to support the expansion of our Oakland and San Francisco coding cohorts and apprenticeship pathway over the next program year.

Specifically, this investment would help us onboard a new East Bay school site, fund instructor time and curriculum materials for an additional cohort of approximately 40 students, and support stipends for apprentices in our paid tech placement pipeline.

We are framing this as a targeted project investment rather than a broad operating request, because we want you to be able to see exactly where your dollars go and what they produce. By the end of the grant period, we would expect to report back on cohort enrollment and completion rates, apprenticeship placements, student demographic data, and school-district partnership outcomes.

If $35,000 is not the right entry point, we are also happy to discuss a more focused first investment of $10,000 to $15,000 tied to a single cohort or summer intensive. We want to build a relationship that makes sense for both organizations."

---

7. Anticipating Potential Concerns

"I want to be transparent about a few things you might be wondering.

You may notice that our grant history with your foundation is new, and that your giving has historically spanned a range of human-services organizations, not exclusively STEM or coding programs. I want to acknowledge that directly. We are not asking you to pivot your mission. We are asking you to consider that a free, cohort-based coding program for underserved Bay Area youth is, at its core, a youth opportunity and enrichment investment, one that fits squarely alongside the kind of community-centered work your foundation has supported.

You may also want to know more about our organizational infrastructure before committing. That is completely fair. We are happy to share program data, school-district partnership letters, and student outcome reports. We want you to feel confident that this is a high-performing program, not just a promising idea."

---

8. Closing at High-Level Vision

"I want to come back to where I started. There are young people in Oakland and San Francisco right now who are curious, capable, and completely locked out of the industry that defines this region's economy. We have a model that works, a community that trusts us, and a clear path to reaching more of them.

Bay Area Bright Futures Foundation has shown a deep commitment to the young people and families of this region. We believe this is a moment where our missions genuinely align, and where a partnership could produce something neither of us could accomplish alone.

We would be honored to have you alongside us."

---

9. Final Invitation for Next Steps

"Before we close, I want to make sure I have given you everything you need. What else would be helpful for you to see or hear from us as you think about whether this is the right fit?"

---

Note: Specific budget line items and total organizational budget figures were not available at the time this guide was prepared. Be ready to provide a one-page budget summary and outcomes brief if requested.