Both of these funders accept proposals year-round, but their application processes look very different. One routes through a corporate giving portal with a structured Letter of Request; the other asks you to pitch a project idea through a short online form.

What we know: BMS accepts Letters of Request for charitable donations and in-kind support across community, humanitarian, science, education, arts, and environment categories. The program page doesn't list specific grant amounts, so you'll need to scope your ask based on the project. Recent giving has skewed heavily toward large medical schools, hospitals, and health research organizations.

Realistic fit: established nonprofits or academic institutions with health-adjacent programming and a clearly scoped project budget.

What we know: Humaniti's application form is open to nonprofits, for-profits, entrepreneurs, and individuals with projects in food, water, health, livelihood, and relief. The foundation may provide funding, resources, or promotion depending on the project. No grant amounts are published, and actual giving has concentrated in medicine, food assistance, and emergency relief.

Realistic fit: organizations or project leads with a concrete humanitarian proposal, particularly in food security or health, that can demonstrate potential for scale.

Both programs accept unsolicited proposals, but neither publishes award amounts. Before investing time in a full application, it's worth contacting each funder to confirm whether your project size and sector fall within their current priorities.