Read as text
Tuesday is equity & justice day on The Grant Brief.
Three rolling or quarterly-cycle funders, three very different theories of change: one backs frontline service orgs, one bets on early-stage social entrepreneurs, and one underwrites the litigation itself. What connects them is that all three explicitly fund the kinds of small, scrappy organizations that larger institutional funders often pass over.
1. Together Rising: Grants to Organizations
$5,000 to $250,000 / US and international (via US fiscal sponsors) / Rolling
togetherrising.org/faqs-for-grants-to-organizations
Funder profile: kindora.co/funders/455362738
What we know: Together Rising made 120 grants totaling $14.8 million from 2023 to 2025, with a median grant of roughly $60,000 and a most-recent-year median of $100,000. Nearly half of all grants went to organizations in New York and California. Top sectors are human services, international work, and civil rights. The biggest repeat recipient is Al Otro Lado ($1.85 million across three grants), followed by Holler Health Justice ($850,000) and Out Youth ($790,000). Despite listing international eligibility, our 990 data shows zero direct foreign grants, so international funding likely flows through US-domiciled partners.
Realistic fit: established frontline nonprofits under $2 million in budget, doing direct service work in emergency relief, reproductive justice, or immigrant/refugee support.
2. Smart Family Foundation: Angel Philanthropy / Send Us a Pitch
$25,000 to $100,000 / US / Rolling
Funder profile: kindora.co/funders/522200241
What we know: Smart Family positions itself as "angel philanthropy" for early-stage nonprofits trying to cross the chasm to institutional funding. The funder solicits direct pitches through its website rather than running a structured application cycle. Recent 990 grant data is limited — the foundation may simply not have filed its latest return yet — so the program description on its website is the best signal for now. The pitch process is short: a few paragraphs about the organization, the problem, and the funding need.
Realistic fit: early-stage 501(c)(3)s with a clear scaling thesis and a credible plan for using a $25K-$100K grant to unlock institutional funders downstream.
3. The Impact Fund: Impact Litigation Recoverable Grants
$10,000 to $50,000 / US / Quarterly (next LOI due July 7, 2026)
impactfund.org/about-legal-case-grants
Funder profile: kindora.co/funders/943161863
What we know: The Impact Fund made 66 grants totaling $1.6 million from 2023 to 2025, with a median of $25,000. These are recoverable grants, meaning they cover out-of-pocket litigation costs (not attorney fees) and are repaid from case proceeds. Top recipient sectors are civil rights and crime/legal services, followed by environment. Grants concentrate in California and New York but reach Texas, Oregon, and Washington, D.C. as well. Recent grantees include Disability Rights TX ($85,000) and A Better Childhood Inc ($67,750). Cases that have survived a motion to dismiss get extra consideration.
Realistic fit: legal services nonprofits or small public interest law firms with a filed case (or one about to be filed) in civil rights, environmental justice, or disability rights.
If your organization does direct service or advocacy but doesn't have active litigation, Together Rising and Smart Family are your lane. The Impact Fund is specifically for legal teams with cases in progress. All three explicitly invite smaller, less-established applicants.
#EquityAndJustice #GrantFunding #NonprofitLeadership #SocialJustice
Want grants matched to your organization?
Kindora ranks funder fit and maps your network to warm introductions — before you write a word.
Try Kindora free