Sample funder match
How KOSHLAND FOUNDATION stacks up for Riverside Youth Coding Academy.
This is the same funder analysis Kindora delivers to a real nonprofit user — fit verdict, alignment notes, giving footprint, and recommended next steps. The funder is real; the sample analysis was generated for a fictional Bay Area youth STEM nonprofit.
KOSHLAND FOUNDATION
EIN 68-0069874
Fit score
84
Fit analysis
Why this funder ranked where it did against the sample org's mission and programs.
Koshland Foundation appears to be a strong prospect for Riverside Youth Coding Academy because the foundation’s actual grantmaking is heavily concentrated in California (70.5% of dollars) and especially Oakland (26 grants totaling $5.21 million), while the grantee’s stated growth plan centers on additional East Bay school sites and district advocacy in OUSD. Programmatically, the match is unusually close: Koshland funds K–12 educational equity, digital equity, entrepreneurship education, district partnerships, teacher/instructional capacity, and systems-change efforts in Oakland schools. Relevant precedents include grants to BUILD for youth entrepreneurship in Oakland, Modern Classrooms Project for Oakland implementation, Oakland Promise for school-linked college access, and multiple grants tied directly to OUSD improvement efforts. The main limitations are incomplete grantee data on budget, staffing, age, and exact headquarters, plus some geographic dilution because the grantee also names SFUSD, where Koshland has no documented grant concentration. Even so, if Riverside Youth Coding Academy can credibly position its Oakland/East Bay work as the primary case, this is the kind of locally embedded education/technology pathway investment Koshland already funds.
Strategic framing
The proposal should be framed as an Oakland youth opportunity and educational equity investment, not as a generic STEM nonprofit request. The strongest narrative is that Riverside Youth Coding Academy expands equitable access to high-quality computer science learning for OUSD students through a school-linked continuum: in-school exposure, after-school reinforcement, summer acceleration, and paid apprenticeships. The organization should stress that it is helping build durable district infrastructure for CS opportunity, particularly for students underserved by traditional enrichment models. If possible, it should connect coding access to attendance, engagement, credit-bearing pathways, graduation readiness, and local economic mobility.
What's working
- Direct alignment with Koshland’s Oakland-centered K-12 portfolio.
- Strong overlap with digital equity and youth opportunity themes.
- Paid apprenticeship model adds an economic mobility component beyond classroom enrichment.
- District advocacy for permanent CS offerings connects direct service to systems change.
- Bay Area tech mentor network offers a differentiated local implementation asset.
What's marginal
- The grantee’s headquarters, budget, staff size, age, and exact legal details were not provided, limiting organizational fit analysis.
- Koshland’s portfolio is heavily Oakland-centered; the grantee should not lead with SFUSD or general Bay Area framing.
- The foundation’s typical grantees appear larger and more institutionally established than the limited profile suggests for Riverside Youth Coding Academy.
- No known relationships to Koshland staff or board were identified.
- No documented open application pathway was provided, so access strategy may depend on introductions and strong local validation.
Programs that match
- Oakland K-12 Educational Equity and District Partnership
- Digital Equity / Technology Access and Skills
- Youth Entrepreneurship / Career Pathways / Apprenticeship
- Educator Capacity / Instructional Systems Support
What we'd want to confirm
- How much of the program is actually in Oakland/OUSD versus elsewhere in the Bay Area?
- What evidence shows the model improves outcomes for high-need students, not just interested STEM learners?
- How formal and durable are district and school partnerships?
- Can the organization responsibly scale from 120 to 200+ students and double apprenticeships without quality erosion?
- Is the paid apprenticeship pipeline backed by committed employer partners and clear supervision capacity?
Suggested next steps
- Qualify geography immediately: confirm whether current or planned sites include Oakland and whether there is active work in OUSD schools.
- Lead with an Oakland-centered case statement focused on educational equity, digital opportunity, and paid pathways for high-need youth.
- Build a funding narrative around one specific expansion initiative, such as two additional East Bay/Oakland sites plus apprenticeship growth, rather than a broad organizational pitch.
- Document district relevance: include MOUs, principal commitments, school-site demand, or OUSD-aligned course integration plans if available.
- Show outcomes clearly: student demographics, completion, attendance, coding skill gains, apprenticeship placement, persistence, and any postsecondary/career indicators.
- Frame the LMS/instructor onboarding work as implementation quality and scalability support, not back-office technology spend.
- Seek a warm introduction through East Bay education, Oakland philanthropy, or district-connected intermediaries; absent an open process, relationship access may matter.
- If no warm route exists, consider approaching via a concise inquiry that references Koshland’s Oakland education investments and explains direct alignment with OUSD-related goals.
Generated by Kindora's AI from the funder's public 990 filings, public website, and aggregated public grant history.
Funder snapshot
Capacity and giving footprint at a glance — drawn from the latest public 990 filings.
Total assets
$7.3M
Annual giving
$11M
Geographic scope
Regional
76% in CA
Application mode
Not specified
| Grant size | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range across recent grants | $100k | $200k | $250k |
The Koshland Foundation concentrates its giving on strengthening K–12 education and youth opportunity programs in Oakland, CA — funding program launches, teacher development, leadership networks, and entrepreneurship pathways that serve local students and families. Grants are sizable and strategic, aimed at scaling new models, supporting educator capacity, and building community-facing organizations rather than one-off events or national research. The foundation prefers direct program support and implementation in Oakland, often funding the same organizations more than once to deepen impact.
Source: Latest public IRS Form 990 / 990-PF filings and aggregated public grant histories.
Focus areas
Themes Kindora extracted from the funder's public profile, program pages, and grant history.
Programmatic focus
Funding philosophy
Beneficiary types
Source: Public funder websites, public program pages, and AI synthesis of public 990 filings.
Recent giving signals
A look at where this funder has placed grants recently — useful for benchmarking and warm-intro paths.
Notable grantees
Stated focus areas (from public profile)
- K–12 instructional innovation and classroom model launches in Oakland
- Teacher professional development and educator support programs for Oakland schools
- School leadership networks and principal/leadership development (partnerships with districts)
- Youth entrepreneurship education and workforce-readiness programs in Oakland
- Community-based family and student support programs (wraparound services in Oakland)
Source: Public 990 grant lists and the funder's own published program descriptions.
Sample analysis — generated for fictional org against real public funders
Sample data: Riverside Youth Coding Academy is a fictional 501(c)(3). The fit score, verdict, and rationales above were generated by Kindora's real matching and AI fit-analysis pipelines using public IRS Form 990 filings, public funder websites, and aggregated public grant histories. The funder is real.
Want this with your own org?
Institutional grant prospecting is included in every Kindora plan, including the free trial. Sign up, complete onboarding, and your own ranked funder list with AI-generated intel briefs is ready in minutes.
Prefer a guided walkthrough? We're happy to show you what this looks like for your mission, programs, and geography.
For context: Foundation Directory Online runs ~$2,400/yr and DonorSearch ~$4,000/yr — both are data-only. Kindora plans start at $25/mo and include AI intel briefs plus drafting (grant applications and donor/foundation outreach) inside Kindora AI.