Sample funder match
How THE JOSEPH & MERCEDES MCMICKING FOUNDATION stacks up for Riverside Youth Coding Academy.
This is the same funder analysis Kindora delivers to a real nonprofit user — fit verdict, alignment notes, giving footprint, and recommended next steps. The funder is real; the sample analysis was generated for a fictional Bay Area youth STEM nonprofit.
THE JOSEPH & MERCEDES MCMICKING FOUNDATION
EIN 94-6058305
Fit score
87
Fit analysis
Why this funder ranked where it did against the sample org's mission and programs.
The Joseph & Mercedes McMicking Foundation appears to be a strong prospect for Riverside Youth Coding Academy based on clear alignment across geography, mission, and program type. The foundation overwhelmingly funds in California (93.1% of dollars) and concentrates heavily in the San Francisco Bay Area, especially San Francisco and Oakland, which directly matches the grantee’s stated East Bay and SFUSD/OUSD footprint. Programmatically, Riverside Youth Coding Academy aligns well with the foundation’s education, technology, science/STEM, and youth priorities. The main limitation is incomplete organizational data on the grantee (budget, age, staff size, exact headquarters), which prevents a full organization-fit comparison. Even so, the grantee’s Bay Area coding cohorts, school-based delivery model, and youth-serving STEM focus fit the foundation’s published and historical giving patterns well enough to make this a high-priority prospect.
Strategic framing
The application should position Riverside Youth Coding Academy as a Bay Area youth education nonprofit expanding access to high-quality STEM learning for students who would otherwise be left out of computer science pathways. The strongest framing is not workforce development alone, but children’s education plus technology access, school-linked enrichment, and measurable student advancement. The request should be concrete: support for a defined number of Bay Area student cohorts, additional East Bay school sites, summer intensive seats, or paid teen apprenticeship placements. The narrative should emphasize educational opportunity, structured mentorship, and student outcomes, while avoiding heavy emphasis on policy advocacy.
What's working
- Bay Area geographic match, especially Oakland and San Francisco.
- Direct service to children and youth through school-based and after-school educational programming.
- Strong fit with technology, science, and STEM priorities.
- Educational equity angle through free participation and access-building.
- Apprenticeship model adds a practical youth advancement component that differentiates the organization from standard coding clubs.
What's marginal
- The grantee’s exact headquarters and full geographic footprint are unspecified, though district references strongly imply Bay Area service.
- No budget, staff count, or founding year were provided, limiting comparison to the foundation’s typical grantee profile.
- The foundation frequently funds tuition assistance and school-linked support; the grantee should clearly connect coding cohorts to educational access and student advancement rather than present as a generic tech nonprofit.
- The grantee’s systems-change and advocacy language could create avoidable friction if not carefully framed away from lobbying.
Programs that match
- General Grantmaking (Children's Education Grants)
- Music & Cultural Programs for Children
- K–8 School Tuition Assistance & Support
- High School Tuition Assistance & Other Support
- College Readiness & Scholarships
- Literacy Programs for Children
What we'd want to confirm
- What percentage of participants are Bay Area students, and in which cities/schools are they served?
- What ages/grades are served, especially K-8 versus high school?
- Is the organization’s revenue/budget within a scale appropriate for a small family foundation request?
- Can the organization document strong educational outcomes beyond participation counts?
- Can the proposal cleanly separate direct service from advocacy activity?
Suggested next steps
- Confirm and document Bay Area service footprint explicitly, especially Oakland and San Francisco student reach, school partners, and site locations.
- Submit through the General Grantmaking (Children's Education Grants) pathway rather than tuition-assistance categories.
- Request $10,000 for direct program support tied to Bay Area youth coding cohorts, summer intensive access, or apprentice pipeline expansion.
- Frame the case around educational equity, STEM access, and concrete student outcomes rather than organizational growth for its own sake.
- Include metrics such as number of students served, percent low-income/underrepresented youth, cohort completion, apprenticeship placements, and school/district participation.
- If the grantee serves middle school students, highlight alignment with children’s education and early STEM pathway building.
- Do not foreground lobbying or policy advocacy; instead describe district engagement as partnership, dissemination of outcomes, and support for evidence-based STEM education.
- Research whether any board, advisor, mentor, or donor has ties to San Francisco/Oakland Catholic, independent, or education philanthropy circles connected to the foundation’s board family network.
Generated by Kindora's AI from the funder's public 990 filings, public website, and aggregated public grant history.
Funder snapshot
Capacity and giving footprint at a glance — drawn from the latest public 990 filings.
Total assets
$16M
Annual giving
$1.9M
Geographic scope
Local
95% in CA
Application mode
Not specified
| Grant size | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range across recent grants | $8k | $10k | $10k |
Joseph & Mercedes McMicking created the McMicking Foundation to benefit children’s education.
Source: Latest public IRS Form 990 / 990-PF filings and aggregated public grant histories.
Focus areas
Themes Kindora extracted from the funder's public profile, program pages, and grant history.
Programmatic focus
Funding philosophy
Beneficiary types
Source: Public funder websites, public program pages, and AI synthesis of public 990 filings.
Recent giving signals
A look at where this funder has placed grants recently — useful for benchmarking and warm-intro paths.
No notable grantees pulled yet for this funder. The funder's stated focus areas are below — Kindora updates this as new public 990s are filed.
Stated focus areas (from public profile)
- Education
- Tuition assistance / scholarships
- Technology
- Arts education
- Science education
- Museum/ cultural educational programs
Source: Public 990 grant lists and the funder's own published program descriptions.
Sample analysis — generated for fictional org against real public funders
Sample data: Riverside Youth Coding Academy is a fictional 501(c)(3). The fit score, verdict, and rationales above were generated by Kindora's real matching and AI fit-analysis pipelines using public IRS Form 990 filings, public funder websites, and aggregated public grant histories. The funder is real.
Want this with your own org?
Institutional grant prospecting is included in every Kindora plan, including the free trial. Sign up, complete onboarding, and your own ranked funder list with AI-generated intel briefs is ready in minutes.
Prefer a guided walkthrough? We're happy to show you what this looks like for your mission, programs, and geography.
For context: Foundation Directory Online runs ~$2,400/yr and DonorSearch ~$4,000/yr — both are data-only. Kindora plans start at $25/mo and include AI intel briefs plus drafting (grant applications and donor/foundation outreach) inside Kindora AI.