Sample data

Riverside Youth Coding Academy is a fictional nonprofit. Match scores, fit analyses, and intel briefs were generated by Kindora's real pipelines against real public funders. Learn more

Back to funder matches

Sample funder match

How The Barrios Trust stacks up for Riverside Youth Coding Academy.

This is the same funder analysis Kindora delivers to a real nonprofit user — fit verdict, alignment notes, giving footprint, and recommended next steps. The funder is real; the sample analysis was generated for a fictional Bay Area youth STEM nonprofit.

The Barrios Trust logo

The Barrios Trust

Strong fit
GOOD FIT
Oakland, CA

EIN 94-3323331

Fit score

81

Fit analysis

Why this funder ranked where it did against the sample org's mission and programs.

The Barrios Trust appears to be a strong prospect for Riverside Youth Coding Academy, with one major caveat: the grantee’s exact headquarters and service geography are not fully documented in the intake data. Mission alignment is very strong. The trust explicitly funds youth development, education, STEM workforce development, after-school enrichment, and programs that build skills, confidence, and self-esteem for economically disadvantaged youth in the Oakland metropolitan area. Riverside Youth Coding Academy’s described model—free coding cohorts delivered in school, after school, and in summer, paired with a paid teen apprenticeship pipeline and Bay Area tech mentors—fits that stated priority set closely. Geographic evidence is also favorable if the organization indeed serves Oakland and/or San Francisco as suggested by its partnership opportunities, because 98.0% of all Barrios Trust grant dollars went to California and the largest city concentration is Oakland ($729,450 across 81 grants), with additional grants in San Francisco ($75,000 across 9 grants). The main limiting factor is incomplete grantee data on exact location, budget, age, and staff size, which prevents a full organizational-fit confirmation and keeps this from an IDEAL FIT rating.

Strategic framing

The application should be positioned less as a technology program and more as a youth development pipeline. The strongest frame is: underserved Oakland-area teens gain academic skills, mentorship, paid work experience, confidence, and career exposure through an integrated model spanning school-day learning, after-school enrichment, summer engagement, and apprenticeship placement. The narrative should explicitly use the funder’s language around whole-child development, self-esteem, enrichment, and skills-building. If available, the proposal should show how the program reaches economically disadvantaged youth and supports those underrepresented in tech pathways.

What's working

  • Free access removes financial barriers for underserved youth.
  • Cohort-based model supports belonging, persistence, and confidence.
  • In-school, after-school, and summer delivery creates a fuller developmental arc than a standalone class.
  • Paid apprenticeships align with workforce development and tangible youth advancement.
  • Bay Area tech mentors provide local relevance and quality enrichment.

What's marginal

  • Exact headquarters and primary service geography are not confirmed.
  • No documented budget, staff size, or organizational age to compare with typical Barrios Trust grantees.
  • Need clearer evidence that beneficiaries are economically disadvantaged young people, not a general student population.
  • The model is highly STEM-focused; proposal should avoid appearing too narrow or purely technical by emphasizing mentorship, confidence, belonging, and youth development outcomes.
  • If current programming is centered outside Oakland metro, this opportunity becomes substantially weaker.

Programs that match

  • General Grants for Youth-Centered Programs (The Barrios Trust)

What we'd want to confirm

  • Can the organization prove current Oakland metropolitan service, not just future expansion interest?
  • What proportion of participants are economically disadvantaged, and how is that defined?
  • Is the apprenticeship pipeline already operating at meaningful scale, or is it still aspirational?
  • Does the organization have the operational maturity to manage grant reporting and outcomes tracking?
  • Can the proposal connect coding outcomes to broader youth development outcomes such as confidence, persistence, and belonging?

Suggested next steps

  • Verify and document current service footprint, especially any Oakland, East Bay, or San Francisco school partnerships.
  • Review the Barrios Trust application page and prepare for the next March 1 or September 1 deadline.
  • Submit a first-time request in the $7,500-$10,000 range for a clearly defined Oakland-focused program component.
  • Frame the request around economically disadvantaged youth, paid apprenticeship access, and developmental outcomes—not just coding instruction.
  • Include concrete outputs and outcomes: number of Oakland youth served, cohort completion rates, apprenticeship placements, mentor hours, and post-program education/workforce milestones.
  • If the organization serves both Oakland and San Francisco, foreground Oakland-specific numbers because that is where the trust’s actual giving is heaviest.
  • If possible, identify any informal introductions through Bay Area education, youth development, or tech-sector networks; no direct connection is documented, but local ecosystem overlap may exist.
  • Prepare a concise case statement showing how the program integrates academics with enrichment, mentorship, confidence-building, and career exposure.

Generated by Kindora's AI from the funder's public 990 filings, public website, and aggregated public grant history.

Funder snapshot

Capacity and giving footprint at a glance — drawn from the latest public 990 filings.

Total assets

$970k

Annual giving

$1.0M

Geographic scope

Local

97% in CA

Application mode

Not specified

Grant size25th percentileMedian75th percentile
Range across recent grants$8k$8k$10k

The Barrios Trust provides financial assistance to non-profit organizations and individuals supporting high quality educational and developmental experiences for economically disadvantaged young people in the Oakland Metropolitan area. We focus on programs that encourage healthy habits of mind and body, nourish cultural diversity and educate the whole child, preferring programs that integrate academic skills with enrichment activities to help young people develop skills, confidence and self-esteem.

Source: Latest public IRS Form 990 / 990-PF filings and aggregated public grant histories.

Focus areas

Themes Kindora extracted from the funder's public profile, program pages, and grant history.

Programmatic focus

youth development & leadershiparts and music education (choral, theater, creative writing, media arts, dance)environmental education & outdoor access (urban farm, wilderness training, access to nature)literacy and academic enrichment (reading buddies, tutoring, summer academic programs)college readiness & scholarships / college successvocational, tech skills & career readiness

Funding philosophy

direct service / programmatic supportgeneral/unrestricted operating supportcapacity building / staff developmentmulti-year / sustained local investment

Beneficiary types

Oakland youth (city-specific focus)K–12 students (elementary through high school; emphasis on middle school)foster youthteens and young adults (including internship & peer leadership participants)families / caregivers (fatherhood & co-parenting programs)

Source: Public funder websites, public program pages, and AI synthesis of public 990 filings.

Recent giving signals

A look at where this funder has placed grants recently — useful for benchmarking and warm-intro paths.

No notable grantees pulled yet for this funder. The funder's stated focus areas are below — Kindora updates this as new public 990s are filed.

Stated focus areas (from public profile)

  • youth development
  • education
  • STEM workforce development
  • arts and theater
  • environmental education
  • athletics and mentorship

Source: Public 990 grant lists and the funder's own published program descriptions.

Take the next step

Go deeper on this funder.

In the live product, briefs are generated for your top matches first. The sample org has briefs for 7 funders.

View public funder profile

Sample analysis — generated for fictional org against real public funders

Sample data: Riverside Youth Coding Academy is a fictional 501(c)(3). The fit score, verdict, and rationales above were generated by Kindora's real matching and AI fit-analysis pipelines using public IRS Form 990 filings, public funder websites, and aggregated public grant histories. The funder is real.

Free trial · Every Kindora plan

Want this with your own org?

Institutional grant prospecting is included in every Kindora plan, including the free trial. Sign up, complete onboarding, and your own ranked funder list with AI-generated intel briefs is ready in minutes.

Prefer a guided walkthrough? We're happy to show you what this looks like for your mission, programs, and geography.

For context: Foundation Directory Online runs ~$2,400/yr and DonorSearch ~$4,000/yr — both are data-only. Kindora plans start at $25/mo and include AI intel briefs plus drafting (grant applications and donor/foundation outreach) inside Kindora AI.